• Welcome to the New Conservative Angle!

    We're excited to introduce a new era for our readership.

    For years, Conservative Angle has served as a clearinghouse for news, commentary, and analysis from across the conservative movement. Thousands of readers have visited these pages to stay informed, discover new voices, and keep pace with the stories shaping our nation and our world.

    Today, we are building on that foundation.

    The new Conservative Angle is more than a news aggregator. It is a community.

    Our mission remains the same: to provide access to important stories, encourage informed discussion, and promote the free exchange of ideas. But now, readers have a place to participate, share perspectives, ask questions, and openly and respectfully engage directly with fellow conservatives and independent thinkers.

    As Conservative Angle grows, we will continue adding new features, new content, and new ways for readers to participate. The site will evolve over time based on the interests, ideas, and contributions from the community.

    Whether you are a longtime visitor or discovering Conservative Angle for the first time, we invite you to become part of the conversation.

    Register for an account, introduce yourself to the community, and join the discussions that matter most to you. Together, we can create a place where news is not merely consumed, but examined, debated, and understood.

    Thank you for your patience during our transition and for your continued support.

    Welcome to the new Conservative Angle.

    — The Conservative Angle Team

What we learned about the court this term: an animated explainer

4fce5bd6ee9ece09e0e1e5d440524ac6887c0e29-1920x1080.png


There are a whole lot of strongly held beliefs about how the Supreme Court votes. Many of these involve the court’s perceived ideological divide: there are six Republican-appointed justices and three Democratic-appointed justices. So, as the narrative goes, you get a whole lot of 6-3 decisions split along those lines.

But how true is that, really? This animated explainer, the third in a series of animated videos done in partnership with Briefly, guides you through which justices dominated this term, which judicial alliances mattered most, and whether the court's so-called ideological divide is more hype than reality.

Watch on YouTube

Briefly is a tech-enabled legal content company whose mission is to make legal information more engaging and accessible.

Briefly merges deep legal knowledge with design and animation to produce rigorous, visually sophisticated content for law firms, companies, and courts. Its work includes bespoke legal content projects and a growing subscription platform that helps organizations scale legal knowledge across teams.

Continue reading...

[ H/T SCOTUSblog ]
  • Reading time 6 min read
  • Views12
  • Reading time 8 min read
  • Views10
  • Reading time 8 min read
  • Views11
  • Reading time 6 min read
  • Views11
  • Reading time 9 min read
  • Views11

Comments

There are no comments to display
Back
Top