The following article, When The Mob No Longer Runs the State, was first published on The Black Sphere.

They told you it would never happen: that a conservative president would go after actual domestic terrorists—not peaceful moms, not concerned dads, but well-funded radical groups. Yet here we are. It’s painful, glorious, and utterly overdue.

In recent months, the Trump administration has exploded the hypocrisy lying at the core of “Defund the Police,” “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot,” and the Leftist media’s endless parade of moral equivalence. The crackdown on Leftist groups—those that block ICE vehicles, rally behind Antifa, stand up for “mutual aid collectives,” legal defense funds, and mass migration fronts—is shifting from virtue signaling to federal investigations. It’s significant. And despite the howls from the usual suspects, it’s exactly what should’ve been done long ago.

The Parent Paradox

Remember when the term “domestic terrorist” was lobbed—without evidence—at parents who simply showed up to school board meetings, demanding curriculum transparency or opposing critical race theory? No funding, no coordination, no criminal acts—just bringing their children’s concerns into public hearings. Yet somehow, in Democrat-run media logic, that was “insurrection,” “hate speech,” or “threat to democracy.”

Contrast that with groups who literally plan disruption: Antifa cells burning cities, activist networks blocking law enforcement or federal agents, legal defense funds facilitating bail for violent protests. Those are acts with structure, money, coordination. But under the old status quo, they got soft treatment, media cheering sections, and political funding.

The irony? The Left’s playbook always involved weaponizing virtue. Say “racist,” “xenophobe,” “homophobe,” “domestic terrorist”—inflate, smear, silence. Now the shoe’s on the other foot. And conservatives are watching it swing.

From Signals to Targeted Action

Thanks to folks like Libs of TikTok, the media blackout is cracking. We saw reports:

“BREAKING: MASS ARRESTS of protesters who tried interfering and blocking ICE vehicles in NYC. ELEVEN NY city and state elected officials were also arrested by DHS.” —Libs of TikTok post on X

Blocking ICE vehicles? That’s not “peaceful dissent.” That’s interference with law enforcement and border security. Arrests? Absolutely warranted. If you fund or organize these operations, you’re part of the problem—part of the threat.

Enter VP JD Vance, who struck a chord when he said the government will pursue the funding sources of these terrorist groups. That’s what real deterrence looks like. Not rhetoric, not lawsuits to silence parents—you go for the cash.

Tracing the Strings: Who’s Bankrolling the Chaos

One key thread in this unraveling came via a post from DataRepublican on X (formerly Twitter):

“@SomeBitchIIKnow and I have been working all night. We believe we’ve cracked it. Venezuela. ‘Harm reduction’ policies. Soros DA attorneys. Alliance for Global Justice. Action Network. Mutual aid collectives. Legal defense funds. Mass migration. Antifa ‐ your days of operating in the shadow are up.”

If correct, this is huge. Think: foreign regime funding (Venezuela), masked under “harm reduction,” paired with globalist NGOs, pro-migration groups, legal defense funds—all linked back to political leftism. And the people funding school boards’ parents? Crickets.

It’s not just conjecture. Several NGOs with overlap in mission statements and leaderships have direct or indirect financial ties to high dollar donors like George Soros. These entities don’t just “happen” organically—they rely on money, legal structure, networks.

Historical Arc: How We Got Here

To understand why the current crackdown isn’t just news—it’s watershed—you need to look back.

Post-1960s Radicalization & Funding

After the 1960s civil rights era, activist groups learned something vital: protest without funding goes nowhere. The socialist and Marxist organizing playbooks used in the ’20s and ’30s got repackaged. Foundations, billionaires sympathetic to globalist or progressive causes, foreign NGOs—all became backers of “movements” with various fronts (civil rights, environmental, migration, police reform). Over time, this built infrastructure: legal support networks, media echo chambers, community organizers.

The Obama Years: Institutionalizing the Left’s Grants

During the Obama administration, many of these Leftist structures—“community organizers,” federal grants to nonprofits, university funding—were legitimized. Suddenly, groups that once operated in the shadows were in the flow of taxpayer or donor monies. Litigation, regulation, academia—used as weapons.

But there was always a catch: accountability could be evaded through the veneer of “civil society,” “charity,” “legal defense,” “mutual aid.” Activities that had radical intents were shielded by altruistic logos.

2020–2023: From Protests to Mobilized Chaos

Following the death of George Floyd, we saw something shift. What started as protest morphed into sustained chaos: property destruction, occupation of streets, harassment of police. With defunding rhetoric, lenient prosecution in many Democrat-run cities, and often zero consequences for violence, the Left’s networks expanded. At the same time, conservatives—parents, local law enforcement—were marginalized, silenced, and demonized.

That’s important because the narrative was always: the Left fights for justice. But what if “justice” becomes cover for lawlessness? What if the funding flows make activists unaccountable?

Democrats have weaponized compassion and “progressiveness” as armor for radicalism. When conservatives protest the injustice, their weapons are words and laws. When Leftists act, they use NGOs, financing, protest, lawfare—and get rewarded with media coverage and public grants.

What Trump’s Doing—And Why It Scares Them

President Trump isn’t just paying lip service. The arc is bending toward enforcement.

1. Designating domestic terrorists—not by ideology, but by behavior. The focus is moving beyond vague “hate speech,” and toward groups actively organizing illegal behavior—blocking ICE, disrupting public order, physically interfering with government duties.

2. Going after the money. As JD Vance argued, following the funding is often the most effective way to pull the plug. If you remove the resources, radical groups collapse—or are forced to operate openly, where surveillance and prosecution are easier.

3. Federalizing the response. Arrests by DHS. Federal law enforcement involvement. Recognizing that local Democratic administrations have been unwilling or unable to control this. It’s a return to central authority—because when cities become lawless zones, the whole country suffers.

4. Public awareness & shaming. Social media and independent platforms are finally able to trace funds, expose NGO links, highlight who is funding what. That transparency is their kryptonite.

But What’s at Stake if This Cracks Down Harder

• Freedom of speech vs. law & order. There is a distinction between peaceful protest and organized disruption. Trump’s path doesn’t ban dissent—but expects consequences for unlawful actions.

• Civil society’s coopted sectors. Nonprofits, universities, legal defense funds may have to disclose more, drop shady funding sources, or close doors. That, inevitably, will be attacked as suppression—but it’s necessary.

• Political weaponization. Democrats are already crying “McCarthyism,” “red scare,” “muzzling dissent.” The usual. But framing legal enforcement and funding oversight as suppression only works if you ignore the millions harmed by riots, border incursions, rural school takeover attempts.

• The culture war intensifies. The Left has long wielded cultural institutions—academia, media, entertainment—to propagate their ideology. As funding sources are threatened, that cultural influence will likely lash back, with lawsuits, mainstreaming of grievance narratives, possibly more radicalization.

How Deep Might the Purge Go?

I predict:

• Scores of NGOs will lose tax-exempt status, or face federal investigations.

• Legal defense funds that bail out violent protestors will be audited, possibly shut down.

• Elected officials (at local/state levels) who facilitate or publicly support blocking law enforcement will be named, indicted, investigated, and if guilty, jailed.

• The public revelations will expose rich donors, foreign influence, and connections we never suspected—Venezuelan money, progressive “harm reduction” instead of border security, mass migration vs. national sovereignty.

• All this will provoke a political surge for Law & Order conservatives, reinforcing the argument that unchecked Leftist radicalism was always a threat—one the media and the establishment refused to prosecute until it was nearly too late.

We’re watching a power shift in real time.

For decades, conservatives have been on defense: defending free speech, family values, property rights. Now, the offense is coming. The rules are being enforced. The moral authority is slipping from the Left’s hands (not for lack of trying, but because truth is a stubborn thing).

Historically, societies that allow political violence and organized lawlessness––especially one with external funding––to go unpunished lose their legitimacy. The Weimar Republic, countless post-colonial countries, even local governments that turned a blind eye discovered this too late. Enacting law, following money, prosecuting chaos: these aren’t radical ideas. They’re governance. Trump’s action isn’t overreach—it’s restoration.

A Warning: Complacency Helps the Enemy

But the Left will not quiver quietly. They’ll scream oppression, censorship, political witch hunts. Universities will double down on “free speech” while refusing to host conservative speakers. Celebrities will virtue signal louder. Media will amplify isolated police misconduct but ignore systemic damage caused by mob rule.

If conservatives aren’t vigilant, this moment—the moment of turning point—could be co-opted or lost. Accountability must be consistent. Transparency must be demanded. If a group calls itself “non-profit” but works as a front for violence, it’s not worthy of protection.

Now the Irony

Democrats once called parents speaking out “terrorists.” They erased constitutional speech under threat of vague “hate” charges or “disinformation.” Meanwhile, radical Leftist groups, fully funded, fully networked, fully protected, brought chaos. But now the state is finally recognizing that there is a line. And that the line must be ignored to restore order.

Continue reading When The Mob No Longer Runs the State …