The Insurrection Act Could Be Invoked Tomorrow

Go to Article

Minnesota is calling for open revolt with corrupt Governor Tim Walz threatening to use the Minnesota Guard against federal officers.

We are a nation of laws—and the Democrat Party of treason intends to blow that foundation apart. Minnesota is now teetering on the edge of open revolt, with a corrupt governor threatening to deploy the Minnesota National Guard against federal officers.

Fort Sumter wasn’t just the first battle of the Civil War—it was the moment a state decided federal authority no longer applied, and backed that claim with force. The point wasn’t the fort itself; it was the precedent: if Washington can’t enforce federal law on federal property, the Union is no longer a union.

That’s why the comparison fits here. When a governor talks about being “at war” with the federal government and floats deploying the National Guard in response to federal officers enforcing federal law, it echoes the same escalatory logic: state power openly challenging federal supremacy, daring the federal government to either retreat or respond. Fort Sumter was the spark because it turned political defiance into physical confrontation. This kind of rhetoric—and any move to interpose state force against federal enforcement—risks the same dangerous slide from agitation to outright conflict.

Tim Walz has effectively declared Minnesota to be at war with the federal government.

As Newt Gingrich put it: Is Governor Tim Walz insane? When a governor tells the president and the secretary of Homeland Security, “You’ve done enough,” and announces preparations to deploy state troops against federal authority, sanity itself must be questioned. History is unambiguous. Andrew Jackson threatened to crush South Carolina for defying federal law. Lincoln fought a four-year Civil War to preserve the Union. Eisenhower sent troops into Arkansas; Kennedy did the same in Mississippi and Alabama—to enforce federal law against defiant states.

What does Walz think he is doing—or is thinking too generous a word? This is not protest. This is nullification. This is defiance of federal authority. And it is beginning to sound dangerously familiar—like Fort Sumter all over again.

Gingrich: Is Governor Tim Walz insane? When a Governor says ““We do not need any further help from the federal government,” the governor declared. “To Donald Trump and Kristi Noem, you’ve done enough. I’ve issued a warning order to prepare the Minnesota National Guard. We have soldiers in training who are prepared to be deployed if necessary.” You have to question their sanity. Andrew Jackson threatened to crush South Carolina when it opposed federal law. Lincoln fought a four year civil war to force states to accept federal rules. Eisenhower sent troops into Arkansas and Kennedy into Mississippi and Alabama. What is Walz thinking or is thinking too strong a word for his behavior?

[H/T Pamela Geller]



Comment on this Article Via Your Disqus Account