STOLEN ELECTIONS EXPOSED: Overwhelming Evidence of a Coordinated Vote Theft—Where Is the Justice?

Go to Article

A growing body of evidence from law enforcement officials, election workers, auditors, and whistleblowers is fueling renewed claims that the 2020 U.S. election was marred by widespread, coordinated fraud—not isolated errors or clerical mistakes, but systemic failures that undermined election integrity across key battleground states.

Whistleblowers, audits, and investigators expose a coordinated scheme—yet accountability is blocked, prosecutions vanish, and Americans in blue states are left living under an authoritarian boot.

In California, a county sheriff has publicly warned that the state’s online voter registration system operates on what amounts to an honor system, allowing anyone—anywhere in the world—to register by simply checking a box affirming citizenship, with no real-time verification. Investigators reportedly found individuals living overseas, including in Pakistan, registered and voting in California elections. Once registered, voters are automatically mailed ballots for every election.

Similar allegations have emerged nationwide.

In Pennsylvania, analysts claim as many as 1.2 million votes were potentially affected during the 2020 election, with additional irregularities cited across at least eight battleground states. Critics point to reported turnout rates that defy statistical norms—including precincts reporting 100% turnout or more, a mathematical impossibility under standard voting conditions.

In Maricopa County, records indicate 74,243 more mail-in ballots were included in totals than were ever documented as mailed to voters. Joe Biden’s reported margin of victory in Arizona was just 10,457 votes, raising questions critics say remain unresolved.

In Nevada, election integrity researchers allege over 89,000 illegal votes were counted in 2020—claims that do not include voting machine anomalies, vote flips, or other technical irregularities.

The most detailed testimony comes from Michigan, where multiple sworn affidavits describe alleged violations inside Detroit’s TCF Center and satellite voting sites:

  • Jesse Jacob, an election worker, testified she was instructed to backdate absentee ballots, ignore verification rules, and process invalid ballots—estimating 100,000 fraudulent documents were prepared over a ten-day period.

  • Melissa Carone alleged that ballots were scanned repeatedly, machines jammed frequently, and late-night deliveries of ballots arrived without proper oversight.

  • Hima Kolanagireddy described machine malfunctions, manual entries of unverified voters, intimidation of Republican observers, and ballots with missing or nonsensical data.

  • Andrew Sitto claimed duplicate ballots were stolen or altered, that large batches of ballots arrived in the early morning hours, and that observers were barred from counting rooms.

  • Colonel Phil Waldron presented data alleging turnout impossibilities, vote spikes exceeding machine capacity, and vulnerabilities in Dominion voting systems.

  • Monica Palmer, a Wayne County canvasser, cited hundreds of unbalanced precincts, broken ballot containers, chain-of-custody failures, and inadequate time for review before certification.

Collectively, these claims describe an election system critics say is opaque, vulnerable, and ripe for manipulation, particularly through mass mail-in voting, electronic tabulation, and weak identity verification.

Polling data cited by election integrity advocates adds to the concern, with surveys claiming:

  • 17% of mail-in voters admitted voting in a state where they did not reside

  • 21% admitted filling out another person’s ballot

  • 8% reported being offered incentives or bribes to vote

Advocates argue these figures underscore the urgency of reform. They are calling for paper-only ballots, voter ID and proof of citizenship requirements, an end to mass mail-in voting, and the removal of electronic voting machines and third-party access.

“These are not anomalies,” critics insist. “This is systemic—and until the system is fixed, elections will never be secure.”

Americans get justice only when accountability replaces immunity: when the same laws apply to the powerful as to the powerless; when investigations are allowed to run to conclusions instead of being smothered by politics; when truth is not treated as a threat to “stability,” but as a prerequisite for it.

Justice doesn’t arrive on a timetable set by media cycles or election calendars. It comes when institutions decide to serve the public rather than protect themselves—when courts adjudicate facts instead of narratives, when legislatures enforce oversight instead of excusing failure, and when citizens refuse to accept permanent amnesty for wrongdoing dressed up as “moving on.”

History suggests this: justice usually comes late, after denial fails, after suppression collapses, and after enough people stop asking whether something went wrong and start demanding who is responsible. The real question may not be when Americans get justice—but whether they insist on it long enough for it to become unavoidable.

Highlights:

 

In the 2020 stolen election, we had states with 100% voter turnout.

Not only is that statistically impossible, we had states that had more than 100%.

Maricopa County, Arizona received 74,243 more mail-in ballots than were counted by election officials.

 

Big voter fraud:

17% of mail-in voters admitted to voting in a state where they don’t live
21% admitted to filling out someone else’s ballot
8% revealed they were bribed to vote

Voter fraud is happening on a huge scale.

=========================================



Comment on this Article Via Your Disqus Account