Squad Rep. Calls President Trump ‘ENEMY’ of the State, ‘DICTATOR’ (Textbook Stochastic Terrorism)

Go to Article

As a proud Texan I’d like to apologize up front to the entire country for the Congresswoman featured in this story.

Jasmine Crockett is certainly not the representation that the majority of Texans would have sent to Washington DC.

Unfortunately, south Dallas — Texas’ 30th congressional district, which she represents — isn’t exactly a hotbed of prime statesmanship or conservative values.  And those folks don’t tend to vote like the rest of us throughout the majority of Texas.

Even though she originally hails from Missouri, the corruption of south Dallas surely drew her in like a corrupt moth to a wicked flame… and so we in Texas have now contributed to the “woke” pandemic spreading to all parts of the U.S. government.

And we are sorry.  Please forgive us.

At any rate, she is now a Congresswoman, and her words matter — for good or evil.

And good Lord… does Rep. Jasmine Crockett like to hear herself talk.

Appearing on MSNBC this morning, a lot of dangerous talk came out of the Congresswoman’s mouth.

Let’s listen to the clip first, and then dive in to just how reckless (or… intentional?) the Congresswoman is being with her words:

To begin with, let’s be sure to recognize that she isn’t saying these things in a bubble or vacuum.

Jasmine Crockett is simply echoing the same talking points that democrats have been saying for years…

And which they ramped up as it became apparent that their chosen heir to Biden’s debacle, Kamala Harris, was going down in flames and taking the entire democratic party (what was left of it) down with her.

She’s not really saying anything new; she’s simply reiterating those “failed talking points”, according to a story in the Daily Caller:

Far-left Democratic Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett baselessly said with a straight face Sunday that President Donald Trump is “an enemy to the United States.”

Crockett echoed the Democrats’ failed talking points that Trump is a want-to-be dictator who is “occupying the White House” and “aligning” himself with Russian President Vladimir Putin during her MSNBC appearance. She claimed the U.S. is in a “national security crisis” following the president’s verbal blowout with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a Friday meeting in the Oval Office.

“So, unfortunately, we have somebody who is occupying the White House and as far as I’m concerned, he is an enemy to the United States. He swore an oath just like the rest of us,” the congresswoman continued. “But right now, you are literally putting us at risk all because of what? Because you want to convince your followers that you should be a dictator too, that you should never leave the White House? Because you don’t believe that elections should take place? I don’t really understand what is going on and I really don’t know what it’s gonna take for people to wake up.”

But I’d like to dig in to what she’s saying, nonetheless.  God help us if we allow this sort of language to be “normalized” simply because it is becoming more common in the political realm.

It is dangerous.  And it sets a very dangerous precedent.

What she is doing has a name.  The term is “stochastic terrorism”.

In a nutshell, stochastic terrorism is the act of indirectly creating conditions that are likely to end in a harmful act, while maintaining just enough legal separation between yourself and the act to shield yourself from legal culpability.

Here’s a quick AI-powered rundown on some of the aspects of stochastic terrorism to give you a good idea of how this works:

Stochastic terrorism, according to the online encyclopedia Britannica is defined as:

…the repeated use of hate speech or other vilifying, dehumanizing rhetoric by a political leader or other public figure that inspires one or more of the figure’s supporters to commit hate crimes or other acts of violence against a targeted person, group, or community. In legal terms, stochastic terrorism generally does not constitute incitement or solicitation to violence, which is a serious crime in many countries, because the speech involved lacks sufficient specificity. Incitement entails explicitly directing or encouraging an act of violence against a specific target at a particular time or place, thus immediately putting the target at an identifiable risk. In contrast, stochastic terrorists do not supply their followers with any detailed plan of attack, which means that the particular time and place of the eventual violence are unpredictable.

The popular X account MJTruthUltra did a great job explaining the concept as well, specifically in relation to Jasmine Crockett’s textbook example today.

Here’s the full text of that informative post:

Jasmine Crockett is trying to get someone to assassinate President Trump

Listen to her Language…
• Donald Trump is “occupying the White House”
• Donald Trump is an “enemy of the United States”
• Donald Trump is a “Dictator”

This is called Stochastic Terrorism

Stochastic Terrorism refers to when public figures or media outlets use inflammatory rhetoric to demonize a person or group.

They do so knowing it could unpredictably incite lone individuals to commit violence against the target (e.g., Trump), believing they’re acting heroically.

Meanwhile, the instigator maintains plausible deniability for inspiring the act.

While I admit that Jasmine Crockett isn’t the sharpest knife on the shelf… she’s not “dumb”, if you get my drift.

She actually graduated from Rhodes College with a business degree, went to law school and graduated with a law degree, and ultimately passed the bar exam.

Stick with me here — I’m not trying to convince you that she’s a genius.

And though she may be lacking sophistication as a human in general, she’s definitely not unsophisticated in her ability to MANIPULATE THE MEDIA or use her words to create impact.

She understand the current cultural dynamics of our society on a gut level, and how to manipulate them.

She’s dangerous… precisely because she DOES know how to do this well.

And whether or not she’s ever heard the term “stochastic terrorism” or not, she instinctively understands its’ value perfectly well.  And she is attempting to make good use of it for vile purposes.

I’m tempted to say that if I didn’t know any better, I would presume Rep. Jasmine Crockett is TRYING to initiate another attempt against President Trump’s life.

But the truth is, I do know better — and I still think that’s what she’s doing.

It was less than two weeks ago that Jasmine Crocket went on iheartradio’s The Breakfast Club during which she expressly stated that her allegiance isn’t for the United States.

She stated very clearly that she is “rooting for Canada and I’m rooting for Mexico” against the United States; which is only a “hop, skip, and a jump” (as my Grandma would say) from indirectly calling for violence against our sitting President.

Check out that clip from only a few days ago:

And who could forget her associations with the Soros family?

Those folks certainly don’t have any record of using stochastic terrorism as a tool to weaponize the media against their political enemies… right?

Right.

And it was only two days ago that she used the Zelensky dustup at the White House for an opportunity to play the Obama card.

She immediately took to social media and APOLOGIZED to the rest of the world, as if President Trump’s stance against Zelensky was anything other than a President FINALLY standing for America…

Rather than selling us out for a money-laundering opportunity in Ukraine.

She then condemned Trump on her X account, according to a report by Newsweek:

Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett of Texas issued a public apology to the international community following a heated confrontation between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Friday. The meeting, which escalated into a shouting match, ended with canceled events and the Ukrainian delegation being asked to leave.

In response, Rep. Crockett condemned Trump on X as a “draft dodging dumb dupe” who humiliated an ally, while praising Zelensky as “an actual brave man who has actually been on a battlefield for his people.”

This is how stochastic terrorism works; repeatedly demeaning a person or group in the media in such a way that is likely to cause individuals with certain personality traits to take unpredictable action.

Here’s the full text of her post:

It’s been a long day… but in short, bullies ain’t shit! I don’t care what title you hold! This isn’t some long gone reality tv show or failed casino….this is war!

How dare a draft dodging dumb dupe humiliate an ally and berate an actual brave man who has actually been on a battlefield for his people?!

Let me say this to the WORLD, I am sorry that the bright light America used to be is dimming.

As I said, I have no idea if Rep. Jasmine Crockett has ever heard of stochastic terrorism.

But there’s no way she uses it against President Trump as consistently as she has without understanding the concept.

There’s such a thing as going after the ideals, concepts, and issues espoused by your political opponents.

There’s even such a thing as questioning the CHARACTER of your political opponents.

But there is a difference between fighting it out on the political battlefield in those ways, and SKILLFULLY fielding the weaponization of your words against your political opponent in a way that technically constitutes stochastic terrorism.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett is not just questioning the policy or even character of President Trump in a way that can easily be summed up by the phrase, “well, that’s just politics”.

Her attacks have purpose beyond just allowing her to express herself, or making political arguments.

We’ve seen those purposes play out in previous months, and my fear is that we’ll see it again… if this calculated rhetoric continues.

How do you deal with it?  Frankly, I don’t know.

I believe in free speech.  No — I believe in DANGEROUS free speech, to borrow a sentiment from Benjamin Franklin.

And I agree with the legal limits that prevents everyone who ever says anything negative about another person from being hunted down in a court of law and held liable for all manner of things which they aren’t truly responsible for.

But I also believe in the MORAL and ETHICAL standards… that this sort of behavior is sorely lacking.

How do we stop it from happening without setting precedent for the infringement on free speech?

I don’t know; and maybe there’s nothing that CAN be done.

But I know it’s a problem.  I know it shouldn’t happen.

And I know the consequences — for President Trump, and for the nation — could be catastrophic if it continues.



Comment on this Article Via Your Disqus Account