Despite rejecting morality in favor of moonbattery, even progressives encounter ethical dilemmas. New York Times Magazine offers them guidance with a woke version of Dear Abby entitled “The Ethicist.”

Writes a reader:

I’m a straight white dude and recent college grad who has very progressive beliefs and is looking for a committed partner who, in time, can equitably raise a family with me. … I want to prioritize dating women of color.

Not because he finds them particularly attractive, but because he is a moonbat.

I believe very strongly that one of the main ways to combat racism is through relationships. … I will always be somewhat disappointed if what ends up becoming one of the most important relationships in my life is with another white person.

He is going to combat racism by choosing his partner for life on the basis of race. The obvious absurdity presents a quandary:

Despite my well-meaning antiracist principles, is this preference (as friends have suggested) wrong, insensitive or somehow itself racist?

There are no individuals in the realm of moonbattery — only faceless representatives of identity groups, ranked by their phony oppression status and ideological orthodoxy. At least, by having asked his no-brainer question, he indicates that he might eventually outgrow liberalism, as many do.

On a tip from Steve T. Hat tip: David Thompson.

The post Racist Moonbat Faces Ethical Dilemma appeared first on Moonbattery.



Comment on this Article Via Your Disqus Account