The nightmarish science fiction of H.G. Wells and Aldous Huxley offered only the mildest foretaste of the horrors that are already unfolding:

An article published in Oxford’s Journal of Medical Ethics argues in favor of biotechnologically altering ova to permit lesbians to engage in same-sex biological reproduction. Bioethicist Adrian Villalba writes in “Queering the Genome”:

The potential alteration of genomic imprinting opens the door for an oocyte [egg] to exhibit characteristics similar to a sperm, allowing it to fertilise another egg. This can be achieved by inducing the expression of genes typically found in sperm but silenced in eggs, or conversely, by silencing genes imprinted in sperm and expressed in eggs.

As Peter Singer often demonstrates, no one tops left-wing bioethicists for ethical depravity.

Villalba proclaims that the twisted objective has already been achieved in mice, pups having been created with two mothers and no father.

To inflict this in humans would require experimentation that would cast aside the credo, “First, do no harm.”

There is no potential benefit to the child. The purpose is to advance LGBTism and radical feminism. Not only would it allow lesbian paramours to reproduce, all offspring would be female.

Confirming that he is well aware of the sociopolitical implications that no doubt motivated this line of research, Villalba writes:

The discussion on epigenome editing for same-sex reproduction transcends bioethics and delves into the realms of gender self-identification, the fluidity of reproductive roles, and the very essence of what it means to create a family.

One benefit of religion is that it reminds us to regard abominations with horror. Where moonbattery supplants religion, people worship horror.

On a tip from Steve T.

The post Queering the Genome appeared first on Moonbattery.