Mark Carney is a former central banker, a notorious high-ranking member of the World Economic Forum, and a devout globalist.

The noted three distinctions about Carney and his background make him either a terribly horrendous choice to lead Canada or a perfect choice for Trump’s Plan. Think about that for a moment.

This in part from discernreport.com.

Now, imagine Trump had something to do with Carney’s election, or perhaps simply did nothing within his power to help stop it. Whatever may involve Carney’s ascension to power, the chances for heightened tensions between Trump and Carney and/or between the U.S. and Canada are immense simply because the two nations will be headed in opposite directions.

There may be a large enough percentage of Canadians who are gullible enough to have voted for Carney, however, the likelihood is the socialists in Canada are as adept at election fraud as they are here in America. And with Trump leading We the People into golden times with a booming economy and our engine of commerce  firing on all cylinders, while the Canadians are suffering a Green New Scam-forced depression We the People can imagine by the end of Trump’s current term of office, the people of Canada will have become thoroughly disgusted with Mark Carney and his back-ass-ward leadership.

Meanwhile, let us examine the Pros and the Cons of Canada as a whole or perhaps certain portions breaking away and joining the U.S. Most conservatives have viewed Trump’s rhetoric on Canada becoming the 51^st state as a joke or a troll. At least, initially. And the Left’s musings? Of course, they are stuck on ‘Orange Man Bad.’ And see his talk as mere bluster from someone who they believe to be a pompous ass.

Recall, Trump himself said his talk of Canada as the 51st state was a joke in the beginning. However, now he is saying he thinks it may be a good idea. Keep in mind, Trump is a master chess player and a master deal maker. I, for one, would not begin to believe I could imagine where he is going with this initiative. But for today, let us imagine the U.S. acquiring Canada is a real goal for the Trump Administration and consider the pros and cons.

The Cons

1) Trump looks like an ’empire builder’ which is widely considered poor form in the 21^st Century. Most conservatives prefer America stick to the American sphere and deal with American problems first before trying to change the geopolitical landscape.

2) An annexation of Canada would mean welcoming millions of Canadian leftists into the U.S. as voting citizens. Who knows how this would affect the election demographics. It’s better to leave Canada as a steam valve so leftist LEAVE the US and live there instead. America has been suffering under the weight of increasing progressive control, and now that we are finally turning the tide we don’t want to screw it up by importing a bunch of socialists from across the border.

3) On the global stage, the leftist establishment will claim any US expansion is proof of a rising “fascist regime.” Not that most Americans really care what the rest of the world thinks, but we do still have to engage in diplomacy and alliances and trade to a point. The more the fascism narrative grows the harder it will be to engage with other countries on civil terms, fair or not fair.

The Pros

1) The US already pays for Canada’s defense anyway. Their proximity to us keeps them safe from invasion. Their defense budget is a tiny $27 billion, compared to America’s $997 billion. Their military is minuscule, with 63,000 active members and 22,000 reserve compared to America’s 2.86 million active duty troops and nearly 800,000 in reserve.

Canada has never needed an army because the U.S. is their daddy. If Canada was annexed, the billions expended to keep the country safe would make more sense in our modern post-cold war era.

2) Though there is a risk of bringing millions of leftists into U.S. citizenship if Canada became the 51^st state, there is also a good chance most of those people would leave the country and move overseas. Frankly, the less leftists reside in North America, the better off we all will be, and taking Canada might run them all off to another part of the world.

3) Bringing Canada into the fold would make tariffs unnecessary, allow for more efficient resource development and help dig Canada out of the desperate economic slump they are currently trapped in. But an even more important factor is keeping Canada out of the hands of the globalists within the European Union, who have been courting the nation for years and seeking far closer political ties. In military strategy this is called “area denial.”

Recall the proverb, ‘Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.’ By contending with Carney and possibly subsuming part or all of Canada into the U.S., Trump will effectively keep Carney close to him. With a rabid globalist like Carney on America’s northern border, our president knows well he must not let down his guard.