CIA Director John Ratcliffe Confirms Adam Schiff Plot With “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella To Frame President Trump

Go to Article

President Trump’s CIA Director, John Ratcliffe, confirmed that the first impeachment trial against President Trump was not the result of following the evidence, but was in fact a plot devised up front with the so-called whistleblower.

That statement was caught on video when Ratcliffe spoke to reporters on Capitol Hill between hearings related to the first impeachment against President Trump.

The entire case against him, and the legality of the investigation preceding it, hinged entirely on the claims of an anonymous whistleblower.

We now know the identity of that “whistleblower”, Eric Ciaramella.

And Ratcliffe alleges proof that the first contact Schiff’s committee had with Ciaramella wasn’t when he came forward making whistleblower claims — but PRIOR to the whistleblower complaints.

There mere fact of that contact should have completely disqualified Adam Schiff from acting as a prosecutor in bringing charges supposedly stemming from a whistleblower which Schiff had prior contact with.

And that’s the case Ratcliffe has made, calling in to question the legality and legitimacy of President Trump’s first impeachment in the “Russia Collusion” hoax.

But for some reason that clip has cropped back up and is going somewhat viral, with millions of fresh views on several popular X accounts.

It actually happened in October of 2019 in the leadup to President Trump’s impeachment, the prosecution which was led in part by Adam Schiff.

I’m not entirely sure why the CIA Director’s statements are suddenly gaining traction online again, but it COULD have to do with the treasure trove of HIDDEN INFORMATION being discovered at the FBI — a story I am currently researching that has wide implications.

Here’s a clip of Director Ratcliffe’s comments on Adam Schiff’s impropriety (or at the VERY least… the LOOK of impropriety — which is in and of itself enough to have barred him from prosecuting that case in Congress):

Here’s the full screen version of that video for convenience:

The identity of Adam Schiff’s “whistleblower” was originally concealed — for obvious reasons.

But eventually the information came out, and the likelihood that the entire thing began with a plot hatched by Adam Schiff (among others) started to become more substantial.

Here’s a series of reports from OAN that showed the progression of that concealed information eventually coming to light:

 

Kash Patel confirmed the same — Adam Schiff both led the impeachment prosecution while acting as the person who discovered the evidence against President Trump — all at the same time!

That’s like the dirty cop who plants evidence… acting as the judge who decides which evidence is admissible!

Check out Kash doing an excellent job of explaining that scenario, and calling out Adam Schiff BIG TIME in the process:

Although this actually came out back in 2019, the political powers that be at that time essentially squashed it in to oblivion for most of the country.

I still can’t quite put my finger on why this information is popping back up right now — unless it is because new information is about to drop, and somebody wants to ensure the country hasn’t forgotten.

I even found this fresh writeup of the situation from two days ago on the CountyLocalNews website:

According to Ratcliffe, there is substantial evidence suggesting that Senator Adam Schiff, a leading figure in the impeachment inquiry, coordinated with Ciaramella, the whistleblower whose complaint triggered theinvestigation into Trump’s dealings with Ukraine. This allegation is particularly significant as it implies that the impeachment proceedings may have been built on a foundation of manipulation and deceit rather than legitimate concerns regarding presidential conduct.

Eric Ciaramella, the whistleblower at the center of this controversy, is a former CIAofficer whose complaint about a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky sparked a series of investigations and ultimately led to Trump’s impeachment. Ciaramella has remained largely in the shadows since his identity was revealed, but his involvement in this alleged plot complicates the narrative surrounding the whistleblower’s motives and the legitimacy of his claims.

Ratcliffe’s confirmation that Ciaramella may have worked with Schiff raises concerns about the objectivity of the whistleblower’s complaint. If these allegations are proven true, it would suggest that the impeachment was not merely a reaction to presidential misconduct but rather a calculated political maneuver.

If it is determined that they did, in fact, conspire to undermine a sitting president through deceptive means, it could have serious consequences for their political careers and reputations.

In light of Ratcliffe’s claims, Adam Schiff has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, asserting that his actions were in service to the Constitution and the rule of law. Schiff maintains that the impeachment inquiry was a necessary response to Trump’s alleged abuses of power, and he has characterized Ratcliffe’s statements as politically motivated attacks.

While I don’t generally quote from sites like that, in the case of this newly re-surfaced clip, it was one of the only fresh articles I could find.

But even the fact that there IS a fresh writeup out there along with the clip is a little odd.  (Of course, someone might say the same of my story! — so, there’s that.)

I will say that looking back over this information, knowing that Kash Patel and John Ratcliffe are in positions to FIND (and are finding!) documents and evidence related to this debacle… makes it a timely story.

We were promised a response on this, along with all the rest, during the campaign.

We’re just now starting to see those larger results roll in, if I’m gauging things right.

Exactly one week ago I covered this story when the Trump Administration found and released formerly secret documents related to the ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ probe which was part of this impeachment circus:

BREAKING: FBI Releases Secret ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Docs

That story, too, brought forth information that SHOULD result in arrests by those who knowingly falsified information to give the pretense of a justified investigation — just like Adam Schiff did for his part.

Who knows that the next big story might feature CIA Director Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel side by side, holding up receipts, and announcing indictments!?

On a completely different line of thought — has anyone confiscated Adam Schiff’s passport yet?

Someone should probably check in to that.



Comment on this Article Via Your Disqus Account