Welcome To Our Community!
Are you concerned about America? Join our community, where you can post your own articles and content, without leftist censorship. Team up with us today and make your voice heard!
Join Us!

BREAKING: JD Vance Releases First Statement On Iran’s Nuclear Situation

Conservative Angle

Conservative Angle Administrator
Staff Member
Feb 22, 2018
3,340
988
113
conservativeangle.com

As rumors have swirled over the U.S. military’s potential involvement in Iran, Vice President JD Vance has been mostly silent on the issue.

Until now!

In a long post on X, Vance described President Trump’s stance on Iran’s nuclear enrichment program and stated he stands by the President on whatever decision he may take.

Vance wrote, ” First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”

He added, “I have yet to see a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use.”

Vance further noted that President Trump may have to take action to end Iranian nuclear enrichment.

Take a look:

Look, I'm seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there's a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue:

First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that…

— JD Vance (@JDVance) June 17, 2025
Full text:

Look, I’m seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there’s a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue:

First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Over the last few months, he encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians to accomplish this goal. The president has made clear that Iran cannot have uranium enrichment. And he said repeatedly that this would happen one of two ways–the easy way or the “other” way.

Second, I’ve seen a lot of confusion over the issue of “civilian nuclear power” and “uranium enrichment.” These are distinct issues. Iran could have civilian nuclear power without enrichment, but Iran rejected that. Meanwhile, they’ve enriched uranium far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose. They’ve been found in violation of their non-proliferation obligations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a rightwing organization.

It’s one thing to want civilian nuclear energy. It’s another thing to demand sophisticated enrichment capacity. And it’s still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point of weapons-grade uranium.

I have yet to see a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use. I’ve yet to see a single good argument for why Iran was justified in violating its non-proliferation obligations. I’ve yet to see a single good pushback against the IAEA’s findings.

Meanwhile, the president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military’s focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens.

He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.

But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people’s goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.
Here’s how people reacted in the comments:

I have yet to see a single good argument for why the US should be the watchdog dictating what the rest of the world should and shouldn't do.

— Darshan Pathak (@darshanpathak) June 17, 2025
Nobody wants Iran to have nukes. The American people deserve to see the full scope of evidence for this claim before they sacrifice their own. Tulsi Gabbard testified under oath that this fear was overexaggerated. Can we avoid this ideological forever war?

— Naomi Seibt (@SeibtNaomi) June 17, 2025
Stay the course. America believes in you both.

— Gunther Eagleman
™
(@GuntherEagleman) June 17, 2025
The post <a href=https://wltreport.com/2025/06/17/breaking-jd-vance-releases-first-statement-irans-nuclear/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=breaking-jd-vance-releases-first-statement-irans-nuclear target=_blank >BREAKING: JD Vance Releases First Statement On Iran’s Nuclear Situation</a> appeared first on Conservative Angle | Conservative Angle - Conservative News Clearing House

Continue reading...