Category: “Reason”
- Brickbat: You Hate To See It
- Justice Kavanaugh’s Concurrence in Labrador v. Poe
- Could Virtual Cashiers Be the Future of the Restaurant Industry?
- Alvin Bragg’s ‘Election Interference’ Narrative Is Nonsensical
- N.Y. Bill Would Require Users to Swear They Won’t Use Generative AI to Produce “Offensive, Harassing, Violent, [or] Discriminatory” Speech
- Elica Le Bon: Is War with Iran Coming?
- Letter from Stanford President and Provost to Incoming Stanford Students
- NPR’s Katherine Maher Is Not Taking Questions About Her Tweets
- Google Fires 28
- A Big Panic Over Tiny Plastics
- This Tax Week, Remember That the Federal Income Tax Is Relatively New
- NPR’s Uri Berliner Has Shown That DEI Is About Punishing Heresy
- Biden Opposes Bill That Would Keep Cops and Feds From Buying Your Data
- High School Student Allegedly Suspended for Saying “Illegal Alien” in Class Discussion
- Video of Federalist Society Executive Branch Review Conference Panel on “Law and Order on the Border”
- Unanimous Supreme Court Adopts the Sword-Shield Dichotomy To Explain How Constitutional Rights Can Be Litigated
- N.C. Court Holds Selective COVID Shutdown May Have Violated State Constitution’s “Fruits of Labor” Clause
- Democrat Life Raft?
- Today in Supreme Court History: April 17, 1978
- SCOTUS Misses a Chance To Protect Peaceful Protesters
- Center for Individual Rights Looking for Individual Rights Litigator
- The Best of Reason: Anti-Chinese Xenophobia Fueled America’s First Drug War
- Brussels Mayor Attempts To Shut Down National Conservatism Conference by Force
- Supreme Court Issues Narrow Takings Clause Ruling in DeVillier v. Texas
- Can the Government Say: If You Want to Sell Us These Products, You Must Answer Our Questions About Them?
- Two Cheers for the Proposed End Kidney Deaths Act
- Revised Section 702 Surveillance Authority Poses More Danger Than Ever
- Laws Requiring Social Media Firms to Host Content they Prefer to Exclude Violate the Takings Clause
- USC Cancels Valedictorian’s Speech Over Bogus ‘Safety Concerns’
- Justice Gorsuch’s Concurrence in Labrador v. Poe
- U.S. Sentencing Commission Restricts Federal Judges’ Ability To Use Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing
- Thursday Open Thread
- Upcoming Event on “Solving the Nation’s Housing Shortage” [reposted]
- Today in Supreme Court History: April 18, 1775
- Brickbat: Freeze Frame
- “USC Canceling Valedictorian’s Commencement Speech Looks Like Calculated Censorship”
- Biden’s Call for More Steel Tariffs Is Economically Ineffective Political Pandering
- Adult Entertainment Group Asks Supreme Court To Block Texas Age-Verification Law
- Court Reaffirms Commentators’ Standing to Intervene to Unseal Court Records
- The Kansas Legislature Unanimously Passed a Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Bill
- New Privacy Rights Act Exempts Government and Gives More Power to the FTC
- They Said They Didn’t Want War With Iran. Now They’re Cheering on War With Iran.
- COVID Stimulus Money Lined the Pockets of Scammers and Fueled Inflation
- Brickbat: Timely Manner
- Justice Kavanaugh Rejects The Substantive “Veterans Benefits” Canon
- “Trump Didn’t Violate Logan Act with Reshare of Old Iran Social Media Post, Experts Say”
- Most Justices Seem Skeptical of Charging Capitol Rioters With Obstructing an Official Proceeding
- Massie’s Move To Fire Speaker Mike Johnson Is About More Than Ukraine Spending
- Congratulations to Sam Bray, Whose National Injunction Article Was Cited Three Times by Justices Today
- Why Are So Many People Eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness?
Trending Today
- Futures Tumble, Oil and Gold Soar on Reports of “Huge Explosions” in Central Iran, Israeli Airstrikes…
- BREAKING: Israel has launched attacks on Iran [UPDATED]
- The United Nations & the Origins of ‘The Great Reset’
- Taylor Swift’s The Tortured Poets Department: What do the tracks mean?
- Israel strikes Iran LIVE: Latest updates as strikes reported in city that hosts nuclear programme and…
Google Search
Custom Search